A Logical Theory of Nonmonotonic Inference and Belief Change by Alexander Bochman

By Alexander Bochman

The major topic and aim of this e-book are logical foundations of non­ monotonic reasoning. This bears a presumption that there's this type of factor as a common thought of non monotonic reasoning, rather than a host of platforms for this type of reasoning present within the literature. It additionally presumes that this type of reasoning will be analyzed through logical instruments (broadly understood), simply as the other form of reasoning. with a view to in attaining our objective, we'll offer a standard logical foundation and semantic illustration during which other kinds of non monotonic reasoning might be interpreted and studied. The advised framework will subsume ba­ sic types of nonmonotonic inference, together with not just the standard skeptical one, but additionally a variety of varieties of credulous (brave) and defeasible reasoning, in addition to a few new types equivalent to contraction inference family that specific relative independence of items of information. furthermore, an analogous framework will function a foundation for a basic idea of trust switch which, between different issues, will let us unify the most ways to trust swap latest within the literature, in addition to to supply a positive view of the semantic illustration used. This booklet is a monograph instead of a textbook, with all its merits (mainly for the writer) and shortcomings (for the reader).

Show description

Read Online or Download A Logical Theory of Nonmonotonic Inference and Belief Change PDF

Best logic books

Denying Existence: The Logic, Epistemology and Pragmatics of Negative Existentials and Fictional Discourse

This publication attempts to discover, in language as non-technical as attainable, the inner most philosophical difficulties in regards to the logical prestige of empty (singular) phrases equivalent to `Pegasus', `Batman', `The very unlikely staircase departs in Escher's portray `Ascending-Descending'+ and so on. , and relating to sentences which deny the lifestyles of singled-out fictional entities.

Quantifiers and Cognition: Logical and Computational Perspectives

This quantity at the semantic complexity of ordinary language explores the query why a few sentences are tougher than others. whereas doing so, it lays the foundation for extending semantic thought with computational and cognitive features by way of combining linguistics and common sense with computations and cognition.

Definability and Computability

During this ebook, Yurii L. Ershov posits the view that computability-in the broadest sense-can be considered as the Sigma-definability within the appropriate units. He offers a brand new method of offering the Gödel incompleteness theorem according to systematic use of the formulation with the limited quantifiers. The quantity additionally contains a novel exposition at the foundations of the idea of admissible units with urelements, utilizing the Gandy theorem during the theory's improvement.

Additional resources for A Logical Theory of Nonmonotonic Inference and Belief Change

Example text

Despite the above counterexample, there are many natural classes of consequence relations that are strongly grounded. In particular, imposing some finiteness restrictions will enforce strong generation. 5. A supraclassical Scott consequence relation will be called • finite if it is a least consequence relation containing some finite set of sequents . • finitary if it is generated by a finite set of prime theories. 3. Any finitary consequence relation is strongly grounded. However, a finite consequence relation has, in general, an infinite number of theories.

7. as binary relations on arbitrary sets of propositions satisfying Reflexivity, Monotonicity, Cut and Compactness. Show that if If- is a supraclassical Scott consequence relation, then a If- b is equivalent to 1\ a If- b. Show that if an intersection of any two theories of a consequence relation is also a theory, then the set of its theories is closed with respect to arbitrary intersections. Show that a Tarski consequence relation r is classical if and only if its theories are deductively closed and satisfy the following condition: any world containing a theory of r is also a theory of r.

The following lemma has the same proof as the corresponding claim for Tarski consequence relations. 9. For any supra classical Scott consequence relation II-, Thlf- is a greatest classical consequence relation included in II-. As for Tarski consequence relations, the classical subrelation of a Scott consequence relation will play the role of an internal logic of the latter. 4 Grounded Scott consequence relations 31 Linear supraclassical consequence relations. 10. A supra classical Scott consequence relation is linear if and only if it satisfies the following condition: If a If- c, then A If- c, for some A E a.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.08 of 5 – based on 12 votes